In answer to the question that absolutely no one is asking: ‘Which is the better game Call of Duty MW3 or Battlefield 3?’ The short answer is that ‘game play’ wise I think that it’s a dead heat. Although, I do admit that I prefer Battlefield, simply because there’s hardly any lag on the dedicated servers in comparison to COD’s ’he who has the best connection wins’ peer to peer host service. But, if you’re talking about international sales, and profit, then strictly speaking COD should win it hands down. To actually try and compare the games side by side is wrong.
Given the fact that both games are first person shooters, the ideologies behind them and the way they play are totally different. It would be like comparing fish with underpants. Sure, fish taste fantastic with a pile of chips and mushy peas but you wouldn’t necessarily want them surrounding your man-vegetables would you?
COD is mostly a run-and-gun lone wolf adventure, that occasionally (from a FUBAR point of view) relies on ‘close’ team support. Battlefield 3, on the other hand, is very much a team based game. It’s still perfectly playable with the lone wolf approach, but it is more rewarding for team players. So there you go, without actually going into any great details, or answering any of the far reaching, in depth questions that haven’t been asked by anyone on this page I’ve managed to resolve a burning issue that wasn’t even on fire or smoking. Next week I’ll resolve world peace, famine and pose questions directly to God. Until then I’m going to shout at my PS3 and curse the f*cking , useless lump of walking crap who came up with the idea of ‘peer to peer hosting’ on the COD franchise - may his underpants be of a ‘live shark’ variety...........
No comments:
Post a Comment